Showing posts with label rant. Show all posts
Showing posts with label rant. Show all posts

Sunday, August 4, 2013

Blurred Lines, Conflicted Feelings

On the one hand, I like having something catchy to groove to while I'm driving around town or trying to answer a question at pub trivia. On the other hand, I am 100% skeeved out by misogyny and am not the world's biggest fan of rape culture.

Oh, hello there, Robin Thicke's "Blurred Lines"! Good to see you  go to hell  WHY ARE YOU CONFUSING ME IN THIS WAY?!

To attempt to explain the massive amount of cognitive dissonance involved every time I nerdily groove along to this charming little ditty, I thought I would employ the internet's biggest contribution to pithy communication: gifs. Specifically Doctor Who gifs, because OH MY GOD YOU GUYS, DID YOU HEAR THAT PETER CAPALDI IS THE TWELFTH DOCTOR?!

So, without further ado, I present to you the sublime poetry of Shakespeare  Alfred, Lord Tenneyson  the real-life son of Dr. Jason Seaver from Growing Pains.

 Everybody get up!

Source: televisionwithoutpity.tumblr.com

So far, so groovy!


   Hey, hey, hey

Source: televisionwithoutpity.tumblr.com


Hey, hey, hey

Source: televisionwithoutpity.tumblr.com


 Hey, hey, hey

Source: televisionwithoutpity.tumblr.com

Still groovy!


If you can't hear what I'm trying to say
If you can't read from the same page
Maybe I'm going deaf,
Maybe I'm going blind
Maybe I'm out of my mind


Source: crayonshower.tumblr.com

Well, it ain't Shakespeare, but I can still jam to this while I'm stopped at a red light!


OK now he was close, tried to domesticate you
But you're an animal, baby, it's in your nature


Source: district9andthreequarters.tumblr.com
 
Oh, really, now we're going to compare women to animals kept in captivity? Charming.


Just let me liberate you

Source: doctorwhogifs.tumblr.com
 
CHYEAH, OKAY. YOU DO THAT.

 
You don't need no papers
That man is not your maker
 
Source: mattsmithissexy.tumblr.com
 
You ain't telling me anything I didn't already know/wasn't granted by the U.S. Constitution, Robby.
 
 
And that's why I'm gon' take a good girl
I know you want it
 
Source: mattsmithissexy.tumblr.com
 
Aaaaaand...no.
 
 
I know you want it.

Source: mattsmithissexy.tumblr.com
 
Still no.
 
 
I know you want it.
 
Source: mattsmithissexy.tumblr.com
 
No no no no no no no no creepy as hell NO.
 
 
You're a good girl
Can't let it get past me
You're far from plastic
Talk about getting blasted
 
Source: doctorwhogifs.tumblr.com
 
"Far from plastic"? What high praise! It's almost like I'm a real human being or something!
(Also, this episode of Doctor Who is all this line ever makes me think of. I'm a nerd. It's okay.)
 

I hate these blurred lines
I know you want it (x 3, ughhh)
But you're a good girl
The way you grab me
Must wanna get nasty
Go ahead, get at me


Source: doctorwhogifs.tumblr.com
 
Pro tip: If you have to tell a woman six times in a row that you "know she wants it," she probably doesn't "want it."
 
 
What do they make dreams for
When you got them jeans on
What do we need steam for
You the hottest bitch in this place

Source: doctorwhogifs.tumblr.com

It couldn't possibly be 2013, could it? It's like feminism never happened!


I feel so lucky
You wanna hug me


 Source: wilfulwilf.tumblr.com

Oh, I want to hug you? Do I really, though?


What rhymes with hug me?


 Source: coulombs-flaw.tumblr.com

 Source: romolas.tumblr.com

Someone buy Robin Thicke a rhyming dictionary and he could be the Bard of our generation!


One thing I ask of you
Let me be the one you back that ass to


Source: dwgifs.tumblr.com

As long as we're asking things of each other, let me ask you this: Does that line work on anyone? Do you think women are flattered when you "ask" them shit like that?


Go, from Malibu, to Paris, boo
Yeah, I had a bitch, but she ain't bad as you
So hit me up when you passing through
I'll give you something big enough to tear your ass in two



Source: reddit.com

I think there is a flaw in your technique, good sir. Oh, and also:


Sourcedoctorwhogifs.tumblr.com

BLIND RAGE.


Swag on, even when you dress casual
I mean it's almost unbearable
Then, honey you're not there when I'm
With my foresight bitch you pay me by


 Source: ibegto-dreamanddiffer.tumblr.com

I literally don't even understand what you're even trying to say any more.


Nothing like your last guy, he too square for you
He don't smack that ass and pull your hair like that


Source: doctorwhogifs.tumblr.com

OH, YES! You're totally right, ass-smacking and hair-pulling is definitely what was missing from my last relationship. I can't believe I didn't see it before!


So I just watch and wait for you to salute
But you didn't pick
Not many women can refuse this pimpin'
I'm a nice guy, but don't get it if you get with me


Source: mattsmithissexy.tumblr.com

Yeeeeeah. All righty then.


Shake the vibe, get down, get up
Do it like it hurt, like it hurt


Source: doctorwhogifs.tumblr.com
 
HOW ABOUT YOU BACK OFF WHILE I MAKE MY ANGRY FACE, KAY, THANKS.
 
 
What you don't like work?
 
 Source: wilfulwilf.tumblr.com

ICY DEATH GLARE.


Baby can you breathe? I got this from Jamaica
It always works for me, Dakota to Decatur, uh huh


Source: feckingbatman.tumblr.com
 
Requires no further commentary.
 

No more pretending
Hey, hey, hey
Cause now you winning
Hey, hey, hey
Here's our beginning

 
 Source: 13wilde.tumblr.com

Couldn't have said it better myself.


I always wanted a good girl
I know you want it


Source: doctorwhogifs.tumblr.com

Oh you do, do you?


I know you want it

Source: gif-database.tumblr.com


I know you want it

Source: fallofthesmith.tumblr.com
 

You're a good girl
Can't let it get past me
You're far from plastic
Talk about getting blasted

I hate these blurred lines

Source: doctorwhogifs.tumblr.com

Are you STILL talking? Really?!


I know you want it


 Source: holygifsbatman.tumblr.com


 I know you want it

Source: veryusefulgifs.tumblr.com


I know you want it

Source: reactiongifs.com


But you're a good girl
The way you grab me
Must wanna get nasty
Go ahead, get at me


Source: whatshouldberkcallme.tumblr.com


Source: syfyforever.tumblr.com
 
 
Source: televisionwithoutpity.tumblr.com
 
 
Yep. That about sums it up.


Thursday, June 6, 2013

The End

Well, it's my last night in London. Tomorrow I arrive back in the States--barring any airport/flight shenanigans--at precisely 5:35 pm. (Set your watches.)

Now that my homecoming is nigh, I'm wishing that I could stay longer. (Also wishing I got to use the word "nigh" more.) London is without a doubt among my favorite cities in the world, if it isn't actually THE favorite. As soon as I got here I felt happier, more relaxed, less homesick.

But I've covered that before. It IS my last night, though, so I think a little looking back is in order. 

First, I'd like to pay homage to the casualties of this trip: my only non-broken hair clip, every hair elastic I started this trip with, innumerable bobby pins, the headband that was blown off my head by a gale in Cassis,  possibly my black t-shirt (unclear, but I haven't seen it for a few days...), and my clothesline, which I think was stolen by a stupid person who mistook its little carrying pouch for a wallet. Joke's on you, dim thief, enjoy drying your clothes.

Okay, sorry, I have to interrupt my own blog post for a second. I'm writing this in the Criterion Theatre as I wait for the play I'm seeing to start, and this whole place is full of Americans. I don't think I've heard a single person with a British accent aside from the usher who has to keep explaining everything to these numbskulls. And really, they're almost all stupid. And some of them are sort of rude. It's like a parade of stereotypes, I don't know how this guy hasn't cracked yet. 

It is NOT that hard to find your seat in a theater. I know this. Not only have I managed to find my own seat in many a theater, I was once an usher for Merrimack Repertory Theater. You know what the extent of my training was? Getting handed a name tag and being told, "Rows are alphabetical and seats are numbered. Have fun." (That was actually a pretty sweet job; I got to see every show I ushered for free and I got paid in ticket vouchers which were also redeemable for gift certificates. Oh, MRT, how you spoiled me.)

But seriously. Can you count? Do you know the alphabet? Can you read signs? Then you don't need an usher unless you want a program or someone's in your seat. Simple.

But back to what I was saying. Now that I've paid homage to the possessions that I have accidentally scattered across the continent we can turn our attention to happier things, like the highlights of this trip.

Every place I stay, someone asks me what my favorite city or best experience has been so far. And every time I'm asked, I hem and haw and eventually give the thoroughly uninteresting answer that they were all great for different reasons. It's true, though. Even in cities where I had bad luck, where things went wrong, when I got bored or felt homesick, there was something that caught my attention or made me smile. Some of the cities I did not expect to enjoy much, like Rennes, ended up being hidden gems.

I met people from all over the world and learned a lot from them. I tried new foods (vegetarian haggis is delicious--who knew?), explored, took risks, had adventures (both good and bad), and became my own best resource for problem-solving. I feel ever-so-slightly more capable and confident than when I left.

But sad as I am to leave London, there are some things I'm looking forward to about coming home. I'm going to close this entry by listing them, so as to end on a positive note rather than a bittersweet one. And although my trip ends soon, still have tons more to write about it--I'm behind on travel updates, as we all know, but also on Eats Across Europe, Eats Across Europe: Candy Edition, and that post with pictures from my train rides that I've been promising you guys since practically day one. I'm definitely planning on adding posts about all that (as well as more photos, which I know is the part everyone really cares about) in the near future, so check back when you can!

Until then, thank you for following along with me on my grand adventure. I've enjoyed blogging about it and I hope you've enjoyed reading it!

THINGS I CANNOT WAIT TO DO WHEN I GET HOME

1. Take a shower without wearing flip-flops. Dry off with a real, non-travel towel. Use all the shampoo, conditioner, and body wash I want.

2.  Read a book that's not an e-book...although I don't mind them nearly as much as I thought I would, I'm afraid I'm still a snob about the inherent superiority of real books over virtual ones.

3. Use my laptop instead of my ipad. The ipad is great, but I'm looking forward to having my laptop keyboard and comparatively giant laptop screen back.

4. Drive.

5. Cook. I mean real cooking, not hostel cooking, although I have made a béchamel sauce precisely three times in the last week. But béchamel sauce barely counts at this point...where's the challenge? 

6. Cry. I'm not upset about anything in particular; it's just that I haven't had that emotional outlet available to me at all for the past month and there were some times when I really, really wanted or needed it. Having forced myself to hold in my emotions and soldier on for five weeks on end, I've found that I'm much more likely to tear up over relatively innocuous things, like war memorial plaques and the audio guide description of Thomas Becket's assassination. So I think a good, long, cleansing cry is in order. Recommendations of sad movies--who's got 'em?

7. Listen to my music at full volume without having to wear headphones. Sing along as loudly as I want.

8. Return to my boring routine. Do you know how adrift I've been without my boring routine of flossing every night, being in bed by 11, and waking up at 5:45 every day? REALLY adrift. 

9. Wearing clean clothes every single day. Over the course of this trip I've mostly taken an "eh, good enough" approach to personal hygiene. I wore everything over and over until it started to smell. I am so sick of almost every article of clothing I bought on this trip and I think I'll have to wash everything twice before wearing it again to make sure all the ingrained grime from a month of trekking around is truly gone.

10. Not having to mentally convert prices into US dollars. Sure, 60p doesn't seem too expensive for a single postcard, but in American money it would be about a dollar. Yikes.

11. Really, really brushing my teeth. As part of my "good enough" philosophy, I've been brushing my teeth with hardly any toothpaste, as my tube has been more or less empty for the past two or three weeks and I didn't want to spent £2.50 (at least $4) on a tiny travel-sized tube of toothpaste. 

12. Seeing everyone again! I've missed you crazy people!

Wednesday, May 29, 2013

Technical Difficulties

Hey, guys, greetings from Oxford! It's been awhile!

The reason, aside from sheer laziness, that I haven't updated in what seems like eons is that I managed to fry both my ipad charger and my universal plug adapter in one go. The technology-frying venue? A hostel five miles from the nearest small rural town, and hours from any major technology-selling city. I was also there for three days. (Sad trombone/trumpet/whatever-instrument-that-is noise.) I had also pre-paid for three days of wireless internet access on a device that no longer worked. (Sad noise again.)

So my first order of business this morning in Oxford was amending that situation. I needed an ipad cord and a plug adapter, and I figured in a university city like Oxford it would not be overly difficult to find either.

I started by asking at the hostel. Sometimes hostels will have plug adapters, seeing as their client base consists almost entirely of poorly-prepared foreign tourists. No luck. The guy at reception even checked the lost and found for me to see if I could snag somebody else's abandoned power adapter, but alas, it was not to be. So I did some googling on the hostel's computer and then set off.

My research, however, had not extended to getting directions to the possible vendors of said items. So after I hit the Staples that was literally steps down the street from the hostel, the universe was like, "Should have prepared more, suckaaaa! Enjoy wandering around the least picturesque parts of Oxford!"

I went to the train station, as I remembered seeing plug adapters in stores at other stations. As luck would have it, the convenience store at the station--the one selling magazines and candy and generic Oxford souvenirs--had a universal plug adapter. I bought it and tore that sucker open only to realize that it was converting British plugs to every other type of plug in the world, when what I needed was the EXACT OPPOSITE of that. This led me to two (very legitimate, I think) questions:

1. How can one bill such a product as a "universal adapter" when it clearly only works for people whose universe happens to be based in the UK? I mean, I know "the sun never sets on the British empire" and all that, but "universal" and "convenient for British people" are really, really not the same thing. Down with all remaining vestiges of imperialism!

2. Why, why, WHY would you need to buy an adapter for OTHER COUNTRIES in Oxford? If you are in Oxford or traveling through Oxford, odds are pretty good that you are going to be in the UK for the foreseeable future, as it is not a border town (the UK has no border towns, it's an island, guys!), nor does it have an international airport. Is Old Joe Englishman just wandering through the train station one day like, "Dum diddly dum, must kill some time in Oxford before my train to another equally British town. Maybe I should buy a plug adapter so all my electronics will work in Africa, Asia, and/or North and South America! It never hurts to be prepared, cheerio!"

So I spent £19.99 (that's like $35 for those of you keeping score at home) for a plug adapter that was literally just as useless as the one it was meant to replace. In fact, it turned out to be EVEN MORE USELESS (more on that in a sec). So I was quite unhappy. I chucked the packaging in a bin in a manner so perturbed that it clearly marked me out as an Ugly American (TM) and not a Polite, Proper Brit. Then I stalked off down Botley Road because there was an electronics store located at 3 Botley Road Retail Park. In my mind, this meant that the retail park would be located at 3 Botley Road. The British had another idea and said retail park was nowhere to be found. So I stomped back up the street in search of the Westgate Shopping Center, where an Apple dealer was located, thinking that maybe I could at least replace the ipad cord.

And then I had a horrible thought: what if ipad minis weren't in wide release in the UK yet? What if the cord just wasn't sold overseas?

This trip is sucking, I thought. I am so tired of being a grown-up and having to deal with all the--my mom reads this, so I'll censor--muddyfuddling poo life throws at me. One day with no problems! One day! That's all I ask!

The adult, logical part of my brain stepped in and tried to smooth things over: "It's okay. Stop and think: you're in Europe on a backpacking trip for a month. Do you know how many people would kill to have an experience like this? Are you seriously going to let a dead ipad and a rapidly depleting camera battery ruin everything? Just because you can't take a million pictures everywhere you go doesn't mean you've seen or experienced it any less."

Shut up. What are you, my mom?!

"Hey now, there's no call for that. Your mom is a lovely lady and you didn't get her anything for Mother's Day AND it's her and Dad's anniversary today and what have you done? NOTHING.* You are not winning the Daughter of the Year Award, stop lashing out."

I'VE GOT OTHER STUFF ON MY MIND, OKAY?! LEAVE ME ALONE!

It was an unpleasant walk down Park End Street because I was giving myself the silent treatment, which was obviously awkward. But I did manage to locate the Westgate Shopping Centre on a bus station "You Are Here" map, so there was that.

Made it to the shopping center (CENTRE, sorry, Great Britain) and was immediately shown an ipad mini cord exactly like the one I needed. Sweet Jesus in heaven, a miracle! While I was there I asked the salesguy where I might find a universal plug adapter. He recommended Argos, a store across the street, and, failing that, Curry PC World in the shopping center--CENTRE! Dammit! Gosh dang it! (Sorry, Mummers)--a block away.

That being settled, I went into Primark, the discount department store across the mall corridor, and engaged in some serious retail therapy. Let it be known that I generally despise clothes shopping. You can get about ten minutes of browsing out of me before I'm like, "Take me either to food or a bookstore, 'cause I ain't havin' no more of this. Uh-uh." (I get sassy when presented with the prospect of an afternoon spent among clothes racks.)

However, today I walked into Primark and was like, That's blue. I'll take it! This one has side cut-outs, which will undoubtedly not flatter my body type. I'll take it! This one isn't even the right size. I'LL TAKE IT!

I filled up a bag with a LOT of clothes and then actually tried them on, where cold logic prevailed: "Sweetheart, this makes everything about you look saggy and sad. I don't care if you like the pattern, you cannot buy that."

Even so, I spent £55 ($90...eek) on three dresses, a pair of pants, a shirt, a comb (I lost mine), hair elastics (I'm down to one really stretched-out one), novelty bobby pins, a blingy necklace, and a mud mask in a hermetically sealed pouch. You know how people say you should never grocery shop when you're hungry? You should never go clothes shopping when your entire wardrobe for the past month has consisted of the same three outfits worn over and over, sometimes for days in a row. (Yep, that's right, I've officially become THAT person. Sometimes I don't feel like digging around in my backpack for a clean top, so I just wear the one I wore yesterday or, if I'm feeling particularly lazy, I just put a bra on under my pajama top. Voila! Dressed and out the door in five minutes!)

Primark cheered me up (I mean, the deals! £55 for all that stuff?! What a savvy shopper!), so I headed over to Argos feeling confident, only to have my bubble of happiness punctured by the lady behind the counter.  Upon examining the dead adapter I'd lugged along as a visual aid, she said, "No, I've never seen anything that looks like that. Ever." (Fab.) So off to Curry's PC World in the OTHER mall in the middle of downtown Oxford.

I had much more luck here; although I was doubtful about the adapter that was shown to me, as it did not have any clear-cut spot for American plug prongs, the salesguy assured me that American plugs would fit into the holes on the adapter. "I've sold millions of these to millions of people," he said, which seemed like a bit of an overstatement but I just rolled with it because MY ICKY ERRANDS WERE DONE AND NOW I COULD SIGHTSEE IN OXFORD!

I was so excited about this that I accidentally shoplifted two postcards from a knick-knack store down the street. I made it all the way to High Street before I noticed and walked shamefacedly back, expecting every second to be tackled by a stereotype of a British bobby and thrown into British jail (GAOL, sorry Brits, I'm the worst) where, with any luck, I would at least be given a free cup of Earl Grey. But once I'd paid my £1.40 (quite the heist I'd pulled off there) my day remained mostly crisis-free. Until...

Until I got back and tried to plug my camera charger into the adapter. It wouldn't go in.

It'll be kind of hard to describe, but I'll give it a go. The actual slots in the plug adapter are, for reasons unknown to me, in-set into the design of the device. Imagine the adapter in the shape of a Roman arena (ie, the Colesseum), and the slots are at the lowest part in the middle where Russell Crowe yells "ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED?!"

I was not amused, as it turns out, because my camera battery charger does not have, like most appliances, a plug attached to a cord that will easily fit within the walls of the arena. Instead, the prongs stick straight out from the back of the rectangular charger, and the rectangle shape was preventing the prongs from reaching far enough to connect in. It was the Three Stooges "poke-in-the-eyes" gag but without any of the amusement that usually accompanies physical comedy.

Since my camera charger was the only device for which I needed the adapter, I was pretty unhappy about this. (All my Apple devices can be charged at a computer.) But then a stroke of genius combined with a stroke of luck.

My old universal adapter, the one that I murdered, had a bunch of interlocking pieces that could be used in various combinations depending on what country you were in and where your electronic item was from. (It, unlike the adapter I got at the train station, was truly universal. Just saying.) By a stroke of luck, the American-to-European plug piece had not been in the adapter at the time of the murder, so it presumably still worked. And the charger I'd just bought had a spot for Euro plugs. Success!

And now I'm sitting at the hostel's PC charging my ipad (it does not like the new cord very much, as it insists that it is "Not Charging" when it, in fact, is), and all is right with the world--for now, anyway. I'm sure that tomorrow will bring some new challenge and all I can say is, "Universe, I am ready. Bring it on! Please don't hurt me. Yesterday I cried over a U2 song on a bus. Leave me alone."

*HAPPY 25TH WEDDING ANNIVERSARY, MOM AND DAD!!!!!

Saturday, September 8, 2012

Don't call me 'sweetie'

If you've read the rest of this blog at all, you'll know that I work with the public. It is truly delightful, believe me.

But over the past four years I've become more and more annoyed with one particular aspect of my interactions with customers. I'm sick and tired of being called "sweetie," "honey," "baby," "hon," "dear," and/or "darling." And I think I'm approaching a breaking point here. Every time one of the offending pet names is directed at me, a boiling hot feeling of frustration and helplessness starts in my heart and spreads through my entire chest until I'm clenching my hands and trying so hard to keep my mouth shut and smile politely. Because that's my job: to take whatever a customer throws at me--within the realm of reason, of course.

And let me tell you, I put up with a lot of crap from a lot of jerks. But part of what irks me about the pet names issue is that it's not exclusively jerks who use them. In fact, most of the customers who call me by a pet name are otherwise pleasant, friendly, and appear to be all-around good people. So maybe people just don't realize what's wrong with pet names. Maybe you don't either. Maybe you think I'm overreacting. I can see that--but I'm not. Let me explain.

Pet names are for people you are close to. They are for children. They are for beloved pets. They are not for the adult woman who handles your money. You  don't know me. I am not your 'sweetie,' your 'honey,' or anything else except your cashier. If you absolutely must address me directly, I have a big honking name tag. Use it.

My problem with pet names is that they are infantilizing, and I'm not okay with being infantilized. I am a twenty-two year old college graduates who works, who travels, who makes her own decisions. Please don't put me on the same level as your yappy little dog or your not-yet potty-trained toddler.

Furthermore, pet names are familiar. Like, too familiar. Would you be freaked out if I addressed you by your first name after seeing your credit card? Probably. When you interact with someone in a professional setting, you expect to be addressed accordingly: "sir," "miss," "ma'am," etc. You and me, this thing we're doing here? The one where you buy things and I make change? It's a business transaction. I didn't just make you a macaroni necklace, so stop acting like I'm just standing here to be adorable.

This whole pet names thing often comes up in the context of feminism, and it's not terribly difficult to see why. Look at the pet names that are considered "masculine": "son," "man," "sport," and, if you're surfing off the coast of California, "dude." When they don't immediately point to a truism about the guy's status ("son"/"man"), they're connecting him to an admirable trait (like being a good sport) or bestowing on him some modicum of coolness ("duuuuuuude").

Girls get stuck, more often than not, with the words that paint us as doe-eyed fragile beings wandering around a forest glade somewhere: "sweetie," "honey," "baby." Ugh.

But I hear guys get called "hon" and "sweetie" at work almost as often as I hear girls called the same thing. And it makes me annoyed for them, too. Because they are working just as hard as I am, and they are just as worthy of respect.

Let me put it to you this way: would you address the brain surgeon operating on a loved on as "dear"? If you ever met him (or her), would you call the president of the United States "baby"? If you were having dinner with your significant other's parents for the first time, would you christen them "sweetie" and "darling"? Of course not.

I know I'm not a brain surgeon or a president or anything, but I'm still a human being worthy of decent treatment. And guess what? I don't want to be known as "baby"; I want to be respected as an adult. I don't want you to call me "honey"; I want you to call me "miss," because that is my title. I don't want to be called "sweetie," because I'm not interested in being sweet. I'm interested in being a person of substance, a person whose ideas and opinions and personality are acknowledged and respected. I don't care if you think I'm a "sweetie" or a "honey"--if you don't know me personally, that's not for you to decide. All that matters is how I--a thinking, money-making, tax-paying adult--choose to define myself.

And I am not your "sweetie."

Thursday, August 30, 2012

Woman vs. Macarons

I don't know if you know this about me, but I make a bomb-ass macaron.

Sorry for the slight profanity, but there's really no other way to describe how awesome they are. I tried a whole bunch of other adjectives before "bomb-ass," and none of them really captured the true bomb-assery of those little almond meringue cookies. Thus: I make a bomb-ass macaron.

Or maybe I should say that I made a bomb-ass macaron, because given today's events, I may have to find something else on which to stake my reputation, like crocheting a bomb-ass scarf (maybe someday, after I learn to crochet) or doing a bomb-ass job of parallel parking (maybe never, after hell freezes over).

But let's back up a minute. I started my macaron-making victory streak in July, when I decided to attempt them for the Bastille Day dinner I was throwing. (Yes, I celebrate Bastille Day. Yes, I actually make an entire French-themed dinner for various friends and family members. To say I miss Lyon is a bit of an understatement.) Anyway, I went into this endeavor with a healthy dose of realistic skepticism regarding my abilities in this arena, since macarons are notoriously difficult to make. Even my certified pastry chef sister's reaction was something along the lines of, "Oh, you're making macarons? Well...um, good luck!"

But make macarons I did. I made them while watching the first hour of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Part One, no less. And then I ate about 25% of them while watching the second hour of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Part One, which made for a rather stomachache-y experience once I was into the third hour of the entire ordeal. But the point is, those macarons were good. For a first run, they were even great. Crisp and delicate on the outside, sweet and chewy on the inside. The buttercream frosting was a perfect complement to the cookie. They were a huge hit at dinner and there were none left by the end of the night. All in all, my first foray into macaron-making had been a great success.

I decided to make them again for my grad party at the end of the month, this time adding a pistachio-flavored version to my repertoire. (I was going for a Dartmouth green-and-white color scheme.) Granted, I did not budget my time wisely and ended up having to let the uncooked circles of batter sit for six hours instead of 30 minutes while I went to Market Basket and endured what I'm sure was a thrilling night of overstock, but even this decidedly half-assed attempt at cookie making came off better than it had any right to. The pistachio macarons were a little too chewy and the tops weren't crunchy enough, but it was a relatively minor issue and I still had the almond macarons--aka the ringers--to make up for it. Once again, they were a big hit.

So I guess I got cocky. I started thinking I was some kind of pastry prodigy. Professional chefs bemoan what a pain in the butt macarons are but there I was, knocking off batch after successful batch like they were break-and-bakes. I could do no wrong!

Working directly off that premise, I bought a macaron cookbook I found in the bargain bin at Barnes and Noble and immediately flipped past the basic recipes to the "Fancy Flavors" section, where I promptly settled on chocolate-mint macarons. This wasn't solely the product of cockiness; it also happened to be the only recipe I had all the ingredients for (except for plain almond and pistachio, but hey, been there, done that). So off I went.

The procedure for making macarons is pretty tedious and complicated and involves a lot of sifting, whipping, folding, dough-punching (actually), rapping of cookie sheets on countertops, and so on, so I won't bore you with the details. I'll jump straight ahead to when I pulled my peppermint cookies out of the oven only to find that a.) the top rack was burnt and b.) the bottom rack had transformed from cute little green-colored cookies into a series of amorphous blobs, giving the impression that my entire baking project had begun to hulk out and had been killed in the process.

I threw away the entire top rack without even bothering to take them off the parchment paper, which broke my heart because, unlike the bottom rack, they were perfectly round and lovely. They were also a deep brown, though--pretty hard to argue with that. I cursed the cookbook in the most colorful language I could dredge up and accused it of everything from getting the ingredient proportions wrong to setting the oven temp too high.

In a flash of brilliance, I decided to go back to the macaron recipe that had given me such success from the get-go. All I had to do was sub in peppermint oil for vanilla extract! Way to go, me! Problem solver extraordinaire!

Except the second batch was almost as disappointing as the first. When I piped it onto the cookie sheet, it was runny and it expanded like it was some sort of evil goo bent on world domination. I piped the second half of the batter directly into the garbage can and immediately proceeded to throw a giant temper tantrum in which I enumerated not only everything that had gone wrong with my cookies, but everything that had gone wrong in my entire day. The one bright spot in the madness, my mother and I agreed, was that my hair still looked really nice, which is an unfortunately uncommon occurrence in my life. So there was that.

I would love to make this longwinded story a fable about persistence and tell you that I made a third batch and that it came out perfectly, but that would a lie, because all I did after my second failed attempt at cookie making was eat the sub-par cookies I could salvage from the whole mess. Then I threw the shattered remnants outside "for any animals that enjoy gourmet cookies" and wrote a blog entry bitching about it.

I suppose the next time I make macarons I will be sticking to the tried-and-true recipe that has brought me such success in the past. And until then, I suppose I can console myself with the fact that I still make bomb-ass homemade ravioli...at least, until the universe tries to take that away from me, too.

But be warned, universe: I ain't going down without a fight. And you really don't want a crazy (albeit perfectly coiffed), underemployed college graduate coming after you. I've got a lot of post-adolescent angst and I'm looking for an outlet.

So are you feelin' lucky?

Are ya?

Saturday, July 28, 2012

Kill Me Maybe

I have a bone to pick with "Call Me Maybe." Mostly I'm just upset that it continues to exist.

I mean no disrespect to Miss Carly Rae Jepsen. When your parents name you something as twee as that, you're practically obligated to churn out a dancey pop hit at some point in your life. And girlfriend's gotta be raking it IN. I mean really, good for you, woman.

But does every radio station have to play the song nonstop? And I mean actually non-stop. I listen to top forty radio and there it is. So I switch to a mix station and there it is again. And the soft rock station (which has, over the course of the last several years, widened its definition of "soft rock" to include Taio Cruz and No Doubt...but that's a subject for another blog entry). It's getting ridiculous.

And let's examine this song a bit, shall we? This isn't some grand introspective opus that gives us some great insight into modern America or the human race or even Carly Rae Jepsen's mind. This song states its thesis right in the title. I mean, points for directness, but still. When your title covers the contents of your entire song, writing the song itself becomes kind of superfluous (except, of course, for the fact that no one ever made number one on the Billboard Hot 100 on the strength of a title alone).

So yeah, the song's not about war and peace and inner turmoil. It's about Carly Rae Jepsen giving a guy her number. Like twelve times. (Gotta love those repeating choruses!)

Which is fine. On the feminism front, I'm kind of behind the general idea of not having to wait for a guy to make the first move. Way to be proactive, Carly! (Carly Rae? Jeps? Jeppers?) But on the other hand, I've never been sucked into a frenzied tornado of excitement regarding the distribution of someone else's phone number, which definitely curbs any generous feelings I might have toward the song. What I find especially annoying about "Call Me Maybe"'s approach to some lady giving a guy her phone number is that it's way too proud of itself for the whole situation. "Hey I just met you/and this is crazy"? Really? No, it's not that crazy. It's your phone number. Asking him to call you (maybe) is not that bizarre. Ballsy, sure. Crazy, not so much.

Just for reference, here are some things the Jepster (just go with it) could say that would actually be insane:

1. "Hey, I just met you, and this is crazy, but I look great in white, so let's get married."
2. "Hey, I just met you, and this is crazy, but you have great bone structure; let's have a baby."
3. "Hey, I just met you, and this is crazy, but THE ALIENS ARE HERE! THIS IS NOT A DRILL!"

See, that last one was so crazy she couldn't even stay vaguely within a rhyme scheme.

But this is not enough. The song doesn't want us to think that Carly Rae Jepsen is some weird shrew harpy who throws her number at unwilling men all willy-nilly. Not possible, because, hey, she's attractive and she wants to make sure we know it: "And all the other boys try to chase me."

Well, bully for you, Carly Rae Jepsen. You've got so much sex appeal you don't even know what to do with it. Look at you being all selective and whatnot now, spurning the boys who admire you to offer your number to a total stranger who couldn't even be bothered to call you in a timely fashion or put on non-ripped jeans before he met you.

Also, "It's hard to look right at you baby"? Why? Is he ugly? Is he some sort of mythological monster? Are his teeth simply too dazzling? Is he emitting some kind of divine glow? How will this relationship ever work if she can't even look at him? Their wedding will be Carly Rae Jepsen blundering blindly down the aisle in the general direction of her beloved.

But "Call Me Maybe" tops itself in ridiculous lyrics and repetition when it gets to the bridge, which I will copy out in full so as to provide the full effect:
Before you came into my life I missed you so bad
I missed you so bad
I missed you so, so bad
Before you came into my life I missed you so bad
And you should know that
I missed you so, so bad.
Wait. Stop. You guys. What did Carly Rae Jepsen DO before she met Ripped Jeans Guy? Sit in her dim room, saying to herself, "If only I had something to light up this space, like a higher-wattage bulb or A MAN WHO IS APPARENTLY RADIATING PURE SUNLIGHT"? I mean, really, Carly. Really.

And what's funnier is that the second-to-last line makes it clear that she's trying very hard to convey this feeling. Unless this guy is ACTUALLY a marble statue, I think he gets it. Really, Carly, it's okay. He knows. This song isn't exactly a prime example of subtlety. I mean, I know every issue of  Cosmo features an article about how men are stupid and can't pick up on body language and social cues and whatnot (sidebar: UNFAIR. Men, I'm sorry), but you've been pretty clear about your intentions what with the number-giving and the apparent gaze-averting and all that.

Wednesday, March 28, 2012

In defense of Greek Life...and of Dartmouth

Dartmouth has got some problems.

Eight months out of the year, the weather kind of sucks. The new meal plan is all but highway robbery. The administration is often unresponsive to student concerns. The college laid off 76 workers to cut the budget but then proceeded to needlessly redecorate Baker Main Hall (before / after)and install a bazillion flat screen TVs in the newly-renovated dining hall (most of which display only one or two alternating screens...why not just get signs made?!). Most of these issues are only noted by members of the Dartmouth community, but recently one of Dartmouth's bigger problems has made headlines.

I'm talking of course, about hazing.

After Andrew Lohse's article in The Dartmouth was leaked the night before its publication, it was simply everywhere. Jezebel, Gawker, and The Boston Globe have all run stories about it, and an exclusive Rolling Stone article was published today. So it's safe to say that everyone in the world now knows that Dartmouth is hellish hotbed of dehumanizing criminal activity. Down with the frats! Down with the Greek system!

Except wait. I've been in a sorority at Dartmouth for the last three years, and the horrors described in Lohse's article could not be any further removed from what my own Greek experience has been.

Look, I'm not saying that hazing is not a problem. It is. It's a horrible, ugly, pervasive problem and it is one that the Dartmouth community must solve sooner rather than later. Our Greek system is flawed. Our sexual assault rates are far too high. Let's be blunt: our campus has a reputation as an alcohol-saturated breeding ground for privileged dumbasses. And to be sure, I have met people in my time here who do such a good job of confirming that stereotype that they seem more like cartoon characters than real people. But the truth is that the majority of the people I have met at Dartmouth--and, more particularly, through my Greek experience--are kind, conscientious, thoughtful, driven, intelligent, community-oriented, and genuine.

Greek houses on Dartmouth's campus are not just bizarre underworld dens of debauchery and sin. Fraternities, sororities, and co-eds co-sponsor panel discussions and community events; they fund raise for different charities; they put on events for the campus and the community. Yes, some of these houses do have a much darker side once it's a Friday night or a big weekend. That's unfortunate, and I'm not going to pretend that Greek houses are all pure as the driven snow. To do so would be an insult to those who have been adversely affected by hazing or by the other not-so-admirable aspects of the Greek system. The atmosphere surrounding Greek life certainly needs to change. But fraternities and sororities (and co-eds!) are not just one-sided forces of evil.

It seems that Greek organizations only get press when they've done something wrong. I've seen no major news articles picking up stories about AZD's White Rose Benefit, or APhi's Red Dress Gala, or Tri-Kap's holiday parties/carnivals for local kids. When my sorority raised $3,300 for the prevention of child abuse last year (and the governor of New Hampshire issued a proclamation to be read at the event), it didn't make headlines. When we raised almost $3,000 this year for the same cause, I didn't see any bloggers patting us on the back for a job well done.

Last spring, when Dartmouth's eight sororities drafted a resolution that punished fraternities for ignoring assaults that involved either their brothers or their houses, there was no media firestorm. The article was picked up by a few off-campus publications, like Jezebel and the Chronicle of Higher Education, but no national news outlets were offering Panhellenic officers an exclusive interview deal. No one really wants to see houses taking a stand and combating the stereotype of Greeks as irresponsible, shallow partiers. The sensational stories, the ones that make people shake their heads and say "I told you so"--those are the stories that make headlines.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that this article is entirely wrong: the discussion about hazing is one that needs to happen. But it is not a problem that plagues only Dartmouth. It's not even one that affects just Greek houses. Hazing is a problem that is pervasive throughout our society, from adults right down to young kids. It goes hand in hand with bullying, sexual assault, hate crimes, and other acts of violence. It is one symptom of a larger problem in our society--indifference. Indifference to the feelings of others, indifference toward the consequences of one's actions, indifference even toward one's own self-worth or self-respect.

And this is perhaps one of the things that upset me the most about this article: the way it portrayed Dartmouth students. I'm not talking about the ones involved in this whole hazing scandal, or even those involved in Greek life. I'm talking about the thousands of undergraduates who weren't exclusively interviewed by Rolling Stone.

True, most of us have never struck a deal with a major media outlet to dish on our Dartmouth experiences. But just because we haven't managed this feat (yet...?) doesn't mean that we don't have anything to say. Because if I could choose one word to describe the Dartmouth student body, "apathetic" would not be it. In my nearly four years at Dartmouth, I have discussed the College's many problems in a variety of contexts: in classes, at dinner, over drinks, and even in sorority meetings. When a violent or demeaning event occurs on campus, student initiatives often spring up even before the administration can respond. This could easily be read as a damning statement on the College's administration (and maybe, in some ways, it is) but it certainly isn't a condemnation of student activism. The people I know here care. They often care even more than I do myself, and let me tell you, no one in my life would describe me as apathetic about social justice.

But the part of the article I found even more ridiculous than the alleged apathy of the student body was the needless attack on freshman trips. Dartmouth's pre-orientation program consists of (completely optional) five-day long trips into the wilderness. The trips all end up at the Moosilauke Ravine Lodge, which is owned by the College, where members of different trip groups all come together and meet each other. Pretty innocent stuff. Not if you're Rolling Stone, though:

This is a Dartmouth tradition, where students hike, kayak, mountain bike or otherwise explore the White Mountains for a few days, winding up at the Dartmouth-owned Moosilauke Ravine Lodge, or the "lodj," where they gather for a communal dinner, followed by song-and-dance routines, and they are even asked to sit on the floor and listen to ghost stories.

Wait. You're kidding me! They're EVEN ASKED TO SIT ON THE FLOOR AND LISTEN TO GHOST STORIES! The nerve! You know what else freshman are EVEN ASKED to do? They're even asked to wake up before 10 am to attend Matriculation! They're even asked to get involved in campus activities! Would you believe it, these kids are even asked to show up to class and turn in work for grades! What kind of a toxic environment is this?!

Look, my freshman trip was fun at the time. It's not the shining memory for me that it is for some people, and I'll even grant that Lohse has a point when he remarks that "[t]here is a very specific message you get on Trips...which is 'We're all your friends, you're part of this awesome new world of Dartmouth, and if you're not having the absolute best time of your life, then there's something really wrong with you.'" Yes, the tagline of Trips could be "OMG, you guys! Isn't this just SO FUN?!" but honestly, I doubt that freshman orientation activities at any other school are really any different. You're trying to get a bunch of eighteen-year-olds to bond with each other. You're going to have to play some of those awkward ice-breaker games that everyone hates, but it's a bit of a stretch to call that hazing. From the perspective of someone who's been through Trips, this unnecessary digression did nothing more than weaken the article's argument and trivialize the ACTUAL hazing issues on campus. Serving freshman a Green Eggs and Ham-themed breakfast is not a crime. Eating a "vomlet" and eating some scrambled eggs dyed with green food coloring are two completely different things. And, in the interest of setting the record straight, I ate green eggs (but no ham) two weeks ago at a Saint Patrick's Day brunch. Quick, alert the presses, I've been hazed and I want to share my exclusive and heartbreaking tale!

That last snarky sentence aside, I don't want to comment on Andrew Lohse personally. I don't know him. I can't tell you anything about him other than what I've heard from news stories or word of mouth. He might be an upstanding crusader for justice; he might be the devil himself. Experience has taught me that he, like most of us, probably falls somewhere between those two extremes. Whatever his life story, I'm not really interested in him. I'm interested in the issues he's raised--both the legitimate and the non-legitimate ones.

At the end of the day, Dartmouth has its problems. So does any other school. When I graduate in a few short months (!!!) I will not be planning my immediate return to Dartmouth. I'll never be the alum at all the football games, hanging around town, partying on Frat Row. (Yes, there are alumni that do that. It's a Dartmouth thing, I guess.) Basically, I'm done with Dartmouth. It has not been the greatest four years of my life. But despite my problems with Dartmouth (and, as you can tell, I do have a few), it would be unfair to pretend that my time here has been miserable and unproductive--quite the opposite is true, actually. The Rolling Stone article is terrible PR for Dartmouth, but what's worse is that many of its accusations and implications are largely unfounded or grossly overexaggerated.

Dartmouth used to be the Ivy no one remembered. Now it's the one that will be remembered for all the wrong reasons. And for a school that, despite its problems, has so much to offer, that's truly a shame.

Friday, October 22, 2010

My mind is a pretty weird place.

English notes 10/22

The Canterbury Tales: The Wife of Bath's Tale
Wife is actively trying to find her voice
- But she is forced almost necessarily to draw on all the preexisting discourses that shape her because that's the language she has at her disposal
- Has to give a sermon in defense of her idea of marriage

Turns around one of the fundamental tropes of antifeminism by accusing her husbands of lecturing her when she's drunk (it's all a lie, though).

Wife as proto-capitalist subject --> understands her life and position in the world as fundamentally economic and based on consumption
  • She desires because she lacks, and she lacks because there's been a "cut" of some kind (symbolic castration)

Prologue, line 509: Middle English "glose" = gloss, interpret. Her fifth husband knows how to read her/interpret her, and that's why she's attracted to him

DAMN IT, IT IS SNOWING OUT. WE ARE DIGRESSING ABOUT THE SNOW. I AM WEARING LEGGINGS AND A CARDIGAN.
oh, no, wait. it's stopped. thank the lord.

but SERIOUSLY. there are still leaves on the trees.

okay, back to work.

but it was just so FUNNY. an entire room full of people got distracted and prof was like, 'what?' and someone said, 'snow,' and he went, 'oh, well, you know. new england.' and then told us how when he moved here from LA he thought snow was "volcanic ash falling from the sky." ha.

NO, IT IS STILL GOING. WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG. bad hanover. bad. snow is only pretty between thanksgiving and new year's. everyone knows that. except skiiers. but they're crazy. they strap sticks to their feet and whiz downhill at speeds that no unaided human should ever achieve. crazy. we shouldn't use them as our authorities on desirable weather.

i can practically hear this snow taunting me. "wee-hee, i'm a little snowflake, i'm here a month early! not for any real reason, since i'm not even going to bother to accumulate, i'm only here to freak you the hell out about how it's almost winter and another year is gone by and you're still broke, single, and lacking definitive direction in life! tee-frickin'-hee! aren't i adorable?!"

no, snow, i hate you. with your stupid mickey-mouse-y voice and the taunting way in which you swirl outside, as if you're circling me going, "c'mon, take your best shot. oh-oh-OHHHH, missed me, suckaaaa! i'm SNOW, BITCH. y'all can't touch this!"

whew. coast is clear. yes. a good long stare out the window has proven that the sky is barren. ha-HA, sky. HA. HA.


language of choice = attribution of sovereignty to old hag that rewards knight's fantasies ROGUE FLAKE SPOTTED. okay. we're good. we're good. that's right, RUN AWAY! i will break out my roommate's hair dryer and BLOW DRY you, fools! y'all will MELT!
--> tale consists of wife's fundamental fantasy: man listens to his wife, and then she gets to be young and beautiful again.

male fantasy rather than female fantasy? --> why does a wife who is both true and beautiful have to be a fantasy at all?

possible sighting: it was either a distant leaf falling or a close up snow flake. i'm gonna go with leaf for my own sanity.

?!?!?!?!

Tuesday, September 22, 2009

An Update for Kelly

Things I Suspect My Upstairs Neighbors of Owning, Based on Noise Level Generated
1. An anvil
2. Bowling balls (yes, plural)
3. Clogs (the big honkin' wooden Dutch kind, not the hippie Birkenstock kind)
4. A dorm-room-sized Mack truck
5. Many trophies recognizing the resident as International Foot-Stomping Champion
6. A pet elephant/rhinoceros/yeti.

Things My Upstairs Neighbors Will Soon Own If They Don't Knock It Off and Go To Sleep Already (For Pete's Sake, It's Two in the Morning)
1. Several mildly threatening notes
2. An ice pack for the black eye they don't have...yet.
3. My high-heeled black pumps (since I assume they won't give them back after I hurl them through the doorway and run).

Thursday, July 23, 2009

In which the public, the media, the CPD, and others all gatz out

Normally I don't blog about serious issues - unless you count my Market Basket adventures as serious - but after all the hullabaloo (it's so rare I get a chance to actually use that word...) over the arrest of Professor Henry Louis Gates, Jr. in Cambridge, I wanted to chime in.

The story is basically this: Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates, Jr. was returning home from traveling last week. When he arrived at his home, the door was jammed shut, so he was forced to break into his own home. A neighbor saw this and, not realizing that Gates was the homeowner, called the police to report a possible break-in. Sgt. James Crowley responded to the call. Now this is where things become muddled. According to the police report, Sgt. Crowley asked Gates for ID. Gates refused and shouted, "This is what happens to black men in America!" He also apparently told the officer, "You don't know who you're messing with."

There's a gap in the police report as the officer filling out the report left Gates's home to go speak with the person who called about the possible break-in. When the officer returned, Gates and Crowley were on the porch of Gates's home and Gates was still shouting at Crowley and calling him racist. By this time a crowd of about seven had gathered and was watching the incident. Gates was arrested for disorderly conduct.

According to Gates, his "disorderly conduct" was to merely demand that Sgt. Crowley give him his name and badge number.

Since then, the charges have been dropped and almost everyone up and down the totem pole - from the Cambridge Police to the Mayor of Cambridge - has apologized to Professor Gates. Arresting officer Sgt. James Crowley has not apologized, however, and says, "There will be no apology."

In his speech last night, President Obama remarked that, while he didn't have all the facts about Gates's arrest, he believe that the Cambridge police acted "stupidly" by arresting someone who'd already proven that the house was his own, and commented that, despite the fact the the role of race/racism in the arrest was unclear, the incident served as a sad reminder that minorities, particularly African-Americans and Hispanics, are more often the targets of criminal suspicion and unjust arrests.

Sadly, it is true that minorities are more often the target of suspicion and arrest. I'm not disputing this fact, and I doubt that there are many people who would. Race relations in America are far from perfect - in many places, they're far from acceptable, let alone perfect. But in this particular case, the question is not "Does America have a race problem?" but "Was Sgt. Crowley wrong to arrest Professor Gates?"

As far as I'm concerned, the president himself acted "stupidly" when he commented on an event that a.) was a local - not a national - incident, and b.) he openly admitted he did not have all the facts on. If I were making a speech on national TV, a speech that would be heard by people both in America and around the world, I would want to make damn well sure that I had my facts straight, for the sake of personal and national integrity and for the sake of my own political well-being. I've been inclined to approve of President Obama up until this point - I did vote for the man, after all, and I will admit to celebrating his win with much cheering and hugging and jumping around - but this was a major political faux pas. Scratch that, it wasn't a faux pas - "faux pas" makes it sound too cutesy - it was a major political mistake. Please redeem yourself, President Obama. I don't want to give up on you just yet, but know that I won't forget your horning in on an event that - race-motivated or not - did not and does not officially concern you.

Moving on to the broader issue of the arrest in general: Sgt. Crowley is accused of racism for arresting Professor Gates. Let's lay out the facts of the case: A police officer responds to a report of a possible break-in. When he arrives, the suspect is already inside the house. The officer doesn't pull his gun. He doesn't yell at the suspect to get on the ground. Instead, he asks the suspect to step outside and requests ID to ascertain if the suspect is indeed the homeowner.

According to the police reports of both Sgt. Crowley and the officer accompanying him, Professor Gates initially refused to provide identification. According to a statement released by Gates's lawyer, Gates told the officer he was the homeowner and a Harvard professor and when he was asked to prove it, he walked to the kitchen to get his IDs from his wallet. I obviously don't know which of these stories is correct, not having been there. It's entirely possible that both stories have some degree of the truth in them; it's also entirely possible that stories are way off the mark. It's easy to misinterpret actions or words, and the situation is obviously a stressful one for everyone involved - for a police officer, any call can turn violent in a matter of seconds; for the suspect, one false move or perceived threat can mean arrest or having a gun pointed at you. (That sentence is not meant to imply that police are trigger-happy, merely that they have to worry about their safety when responding to reports of suspicious behavior.)

At any rate, if Professor Gates had merely furnished his ID without a problem (as his lawyer's statement claims), this would all be over and done with. And maybe he did show the ID immediately; again, I don't know, I wasn't there. However, it's what happened afterward that led to his arrest. Because Professor Gates wasn't arrested for breaking and entering; he was arrested for disorderly conduct.

According to his lawyer's statement, Professor Gates followed Sgt. Crowley out onto the porch, calling after him repeatedly to get his badge number and name, which Sgt. Crowley never provided him with. Once Gates stepped out onto his porch, the statement says, he was "astonished" to see several more police officers standing there. He asked the other officers for Sgt. Crowley's name and badge number. (Apparently none complied with his request.) Officer Crowley apparently then said, "Thank you for accommodating my earlier request [for ID]," then arrested Gates.

The abruptness of the last bit sounds fishy to me, especially when Gates's lawyer's account fails to mention the fact that by this time, several witnesses (according to the police report) had gathered outside. If it weren't for the witnesses, I might be more inclined to believe this part of Gates's story - after all, police intimidation and racial bias are nothing new (in general or in Cambridge), and it's entirely possible, theoretically, that some racist dirty cops could gang up on an innocent man and arrest him simply for the color of his skin. It's happened before in America and it will sadly no doubt happen again.

HOWEVER, are we to believe that seven witnesses stood by and watched as a calm man was inexplicably handcuffed on his porch and led from his home for no reason at all? Are we going to contend that ALL these witnesses are so racist that they would allow the CPD to infringe upon some of the most basic rights of American citizenry? I could maybe believe that power-hungry police attempting to play God could arrest a man they were biased against for no real reason. What I have a very hard time believing is that said man's fellow citizens would allow it - knowing, as they do, that if one innocent person is the victim of power-hungry police, anyone could be the next victim.

According to the police report, Professor Gates was yelling at the officers and causing a scene. No witnesses have disputed this (although, in the interest of fairness, none have confirmed it, either. Why isn't the media talking to these witnesses? Why haven't they been made part of the investigation?). Although almost every report of the incident points out that it is not illegal to yell at a police officer, what is the very definition of disorderly conduct? According to FindLaw.com, "Almost every state has a disorderly conduct law that makes it a crime to be drunk in public, to 'disturb the peace', or to loiter in certain areas. Many types of obnoxious or unruly conduct may fit the definition of disorderly conduct, as such statutes are often used as 'catch-all' crimes. Police may use a disorderly conduct charge to keep the peace when a person is behaving in a disruptive manner, but presents no serious public danger."

Everyone has agreed that Professor Gates "present[ed] no serious public danger." If the police report is indeed correct, however, and not biased (as many people have pointed out is possible), Gates was most certainly "behaving in a disruptive manner"; after all, the whole situation drew a crowd of witnesses and prompted Professor Gates's neighbor to snap the now-infamous photo of the arrest. Calmly conversing with officers and complying with requests just doesn't draw attention like that.

The question now becomes, was Professor Gates's outrage warranted? Was he indeed the target of racial discrimination, thus igniting the angry and indignant behavior that led to his arrest? If he were the target of such discrimination, did he really believe that yelling at the police about it was going to make the problem go away? Whether or not other aspects of this situation were racially motivated, the disorderly conduct arrest in and of itself appears to be totally justified. If Professor Gates felt that he was targeted as a result of discrimination, there would have been ample opportunities for him to address the issue in court rather than from his front steps.

The charges against Professor Gates have since been dropped, but Professor Gates is still demanding an apology from Sgt. Crowley, who refuses to acquiesce. If he was indeed the target of racism, I can absolutely understand Professor Gates's demand for an apology; my only question is this: if he truly believes that he was the target of racism AND he believes that his arrest was totally unwarranted, why isn't he pursuing this through litigation rather than in the court of public opinion? I feel like his point about the racism entrenched in the American criminal justice system would be better taken if he could achieve some kind of official decision on the matter, rather than a "Gee, I sure am sorry (but not really)," from the arresting officer.

The biggest problem of all in this case is the media and public whirlwind surrounding the case, which has only made headlines because - let's face it - one of the men at the center of it happens to have his own page on Wikipedia. If Joe Nobody had been arrested on the same charges in the same situation, there would have been a couple angry letters to the editor about the sad state of American race relations and that would have been the end of it. However, because Professor Gates is well-known in academia and is friends with many poiticians, including Massachusetts state governor Deval Patrick and President Obama himself, the entire incident has been whipped up into a media frenzy of finger-pointing and speculation (and here I must apologize for my blogger self's part in all of it). What would be best would be for both parties could just drop the specifics and move on, while the rest of America uses this not as a debate over who was right and who was wrong (again, I'm as guilty of this as the next person, but I'll try and contain myself from here on out) but as an opportunity to take a hard look at race in modern America - as far as we've come, we still have a looooong way to go.